What Does AI-Native Mean? How "AI-First" Apps Change HR and Transform AI in Recruiting

Featured

In today’s rapidly evolving technology landscape, one phrase is gaining significant traction within the HR and business technology sectors: AI-native or AI-first applications. As organizations increasingly implement and adapt to artificial intelligence, understanding the distinction between AI-native systems and AI add-ons becomes crucial—especially in domains like learning and development (L&D) and recruiting. This article explores what it means to be AI-native, how AI-first platforms are reshaping HR technology, and why this shift is particularly transformative for AI in recruiting.

Drawing on insights from industry expert Josh Bersin, we’ll dive deep into the architectural and functional differences that set AI-native systems apart, the challenges of legacy standards in learning technology, and the broader implications for HR professionals navigating this new frontier.

Understanding AI-First vs. AI Add-On Vendors

Over the past few years, the HR tech industry has seen a surge in the adoption of AI technologies. However, not all AI implementations are created equal. There is a growing bifurcation between two types of vendors:

  • AI add-on vendors: These companies integrate AI functionalities on top of existing, often legacy platforms. AI is used to enhance specific features such as search, documentation, or analytics, but the core platform remains largely unchanged.
  • AI-native or AI-first vendors: These are companies that build their platforms from the ground up with AI at their core. The entire system is designed to leverage AI’s capabilities in a fundamental and seamless way, rather than as an afterthought.

For example, traditional HR systems like Workday may add AI modules, but the core system remains transactional and non-AI. Similarly, many learning management systems (LMSs) are built on architectures that are over 25 years old, and AI features are simply layered on top. In contrast, AI-native systems like Galileo and Sana are designed to integrate AI deeply, allowing for dynamic, real-time content generation and more sophisticated data analysis.

What Makes a System Truly AI-Native?

At its core, an AI system is fundamentally different from traditional software because it learns from data rather than just following static rules or workflows. AI systems use advanced calculus and algorithms to analyze vast datasets and develop models that can reason through complex questions, generate new insights, and even create content.

Unlike transactional systems, which require precise, validated processes to handle operations like payroll or order processing, AI systems excel at tasks involving interpretation, prediction, and dynamic interaction. For instance, AI is not suited for managing thousands of real-time transactions where accuracy and rollback capabilities are critical. Instead, AI shines when it comes to analyzing performance data, generating personalized learning content, or providing developmental feedback.

Why Transactional Systems Are Different

Transactional systems, often referred to as OLTP (Online Transaction Processing), require strict accuracy and data integrity. If a transaction fails, these systems have mechanisms to back out or rollback changes to maintain correctness. AI systems, however, are probabilistic and designed for learning and adaptation, not strict transactional accuracy. This makes them unsuitable for core business functions like payroll calculations or compliance tracking.

In HR, this distinction means that while AI can assist in analyzing pay relative to performance, it should not be relied upon to process payroll payments directly. Similarly, in learning, while AI can generate personalized content and guide learning pathways, the actual tracking of course completions and credentials remains the domain of traditional LMSs—at least for now.

The Legacy of Learning Management Systems and Their Limitations

The learning and development industry, a $350 billion market, has long relied on standards and systems designed decades ago, often rooted in technologies like CD-ROMs from the 1980s. Understanding this history is key to grasping why AI-native systems represent such a paradigm shift.

Back in the 1980s, airline manufacturers needed to track training for manufacturing and maintaining airplanes—a life-critical activity. They created standards like the Airline Industry CBT Committee (AICC) to ensure training was tracked and certified properly. This evolved into the more widely used SCORM standard, which allowed platforms to track course completions, scores, and progress.

SCORM and Its Constraints

SCORM’s main function was to separate content from the platform using a standard interface. However, this separation means the platform does not truly understand the content—it only knows metadata like chapters or completion status.

This architectural choice limits personalization and adaptability. The platform cannot dynamically adjust learning experiences based on the content itself because it lacks deep insight into course material. As a result, learners receive a one-size-fits-all experience, regardless of their individual needs, preferences, or prior knowledge.

Even newer standards like xAPI, which provide more granular data about learner interactions, still maintain this divide between content and platform. The fundamental problem remains: content and systems are siloed, complicating information retrieval and adaptive learning.

Why AI-Native Learning Systems Are Game-Changers

AI-native systems eliminate the artificial divide between content and platform. Instead of treating content as static and separate, these systems ingest vast amounts of unstructured data—text, graphics, videos, audio, compliance documents—and dynamically generate personalized learning experiences in real-time.

For example, AI-native platforms like Sana or Galileo can:

  • Assimilate diverse data types and sources
  • Generate tailored content based on user queries or preferences
  • Adapt learning pathways interactively, responding to learner feedback
  • Provide instant explanations, clarifications, or skip irrelevant material

This approach contrasts starkly with the traditional publishing model of learning, where instructional designers create fixed courses that are distributed and tracked through LMSs. AI-native systems offer a fluid, conversational learning experience much like ChatGPT, which users have embraced because it responds to their needs rather than delivering pre-packaged content.

The Publishing Model’s Limitations

The publishing model involves content creators analyzing a domain, designing courses, and then "publishing" these courses into a platform for learners. This model assumes a static learner experience, which often fails to account for individual differences in learning styles, prior knowledge, language proficiency, or attention spans.

With AI-native systems, the content is not fixed. Learners can ask questions, request more detail, or skip ahead, and the system dynamically adjusts. This creates a more engaging and effective learning environment that can better meet diverse workforce needs.

AI Agents For Recruiters, By Recruiters

Supercharge Your Business

Learn More

AI-Native Applications Beyond Learning: The Case of Performance Management and Recruiting

The impact of AI-native systems extends well beyond L&D into other critical HR functions such as performance management and recruiting. These areas have traditionally been cumbersome, time-consuming, and often disliked by both employees and managers.

Reimagining Performance Management with AI

Performance management is universally acknowledged as a challenging process. Employees often dislike the evaluation, and managers find it time-consuming and difficult to deliver constructive, developmental feedback. An AI-native system could revolutionize this by:

  • Analyzing vast amounts of work data across the organization
  • Comparing individual performance against peers to identify strengths and weaknesses
  • Providing personalized, developmental feedback focused on growth rather than judgment
  • Potentially automating routine evaluation tasks to free up managerial time

While evaluation remains a sensitive and culturally dependent aspect of performance management, the developmental component is where AI can add the most value, making the process more positive and productive.

AI in Recruiting: The Next Frontier

When it comes to AI in recruiting, the distinction between AI-native and AI add-on systems is particularly important. Traditional recruiting platforms might add AI features for resume parsing or candidate ranking, but AI-native recruiting systems can fundamentally reimagine the entire process.

Imagine an AI-native recruiting platform that:

  • Leverages dynamic, real-time data from multiple sources to assess candidate fit
  • Integrates seamlessly with pre-hire assessments, onboarding, and coaching modules
  • Generates personalized candidate engagement content and interview scenarios
  • Continuously learns and improves its models based on hiring outcomes and organizational needs

Such systems can create a more efficient, fair, and engaging recruiting experience for both candidates and employers, setting a new standard for the industry.

Challenges and the Road Ahead: Interoperability and Standards

Despite the promise of AI-native systems, the HR tech industry still faces challenges, especially around interoperability. Currently, AI systems often operate in silos, and sharing data or insights between different AI platforms is not standardized.

However, initiatives like Google’s proposed agent-to-agent standard aim to enable communication and data exchange between AI agents, paving the way for more integrated and cohesive AI ecosystems across HR functions.

As these standards evolve, we can expect AI-native systems to become more interconnected, allowing data from recruiting, onboarding, learning, coaching, and career pathing to be reused and leveraged in powerful new ways.

What This Means for HR Professionals

Whether you work in recruiting, learning and development, performance management, or any other HR function, understanding the difference between AI-native and AI add-on systems is critical. As you evaluate new tools and platforms, consider:

  • Is the system designed from the ground up with AI at its core?
  • Does it offer dynamic, personalized experiences or simply add AI features on top of legacy architectures?
  • How creatively does the vendor leverage AI to solve real business problems?
  • Can the system integrate with other AI tools to create a unified HR ecosystem?

Learning these distinctions will help you make informed decisions that maximize the benefits of AI in your organization—especially when it comes to AI in recruiting, where the impact can be transformative.

Conclusion: Embracing the AI-Native Future of HR Technology

The shift toward AI-native, AI-first applications represents a fundamental transformation in how HR technology is built and used. Legacy transactional systems and outdated standards like SCORM have served their purpose but are now barriers to truly personalized, adaptive, and intelligent HR experiences.

AI-native platforms, by integrating content and system, leveraging vast and varied data, and adapting in real time to user needs, offer a radically different and more effective approach. This transformation is not limited to learning and development; it extends across recruiting, performance management, and beyond.

For HR professionals, staying informed and discerning about these technological differences is essential. The future of AI in recruiting and other HR functions depends on embracing AI-native architectures that unlock new possibilities for employee engagement, development, and organizational success.

As this AI revolution unfolds, it’s an exciting time to be part of the HR tech community. The journey toward AI-native systems is just beginning, and its potential to reshape how we work and learn is enormous.